JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 16, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.00481.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/4/2349    most recent
00481.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, J. H.
Submitted on May 19, 2003
Accepted on July 11, 2003

Developmental Changes in Evoked Purkinje Cell Complex Spike Responses

Daniel A. Nicholson1* and John H. Freeman1

1 Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d-nicholson{at}northwestern.edu.

The development of synaptic interconnections between the cerebellum and inferior olive, the sole source of climbing fibers, could contribute to the ontogeny of certain forms of motor learning (e.g., eyeblink conditioning). Purkinje cell complex spikes are produced exclusively by climbing fibers and exhibit short- and long-latency activity in response to somatosensory stimulation. Previous studies have demonstrated that evoked short- and long-latency complex spikes generally occur on separate trials, and that this response segregation is regulated by inhibitory feedback to the inferior olive. The present experiment tested the hypothesis that complex spikes evoked by periorbital stimulation are regulated by inhibitory feedback from the cerebellum, and that this feedback develops between postnatal days (PND) 17 and 24. Recordings from individual Purkinje cell complex spikes in urethane-anesthetized rats indicated that the segregation of short- and long-latency evoked complex spike activity emerges between PND17 and PND24. In addition, infusion of picrotoxin, a GABAA-receptor antagonist, into the inferior olive abolished the response pattern segregation in PND24 rats, producing evoked complex spike response patterns similar to those characteristic of younger rats. These data support the view that cerebellar feedback to the inferior olive, which is exclusively inhibitory, undergoes substantial changes in the same developmental time window in which certain forms of motor learning emerge.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
J. H. Freeman Jr., C. A. Rabinak, and M. M. Campolattaro
Pontine stimulation overcomes developmental limitations in the neural mechanisms of eyeblink conditioning
Learn. Mem., May 1, 2005; 12(3): 255 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. H. Freeman Jr, H. E. Halverson, and A. Poremba
Differential Effects of Cerebellar Inactivation on Eyeblink Conditioned Excitation and Inhibition
J. Neurosci., January 26, 2005; 25(4): 889 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
J. H. Freeman Jr. and D. A. Nicholson
Developmental Changes in the Neural Mechanisms of Eyeblink Conditioning
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 3 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.