JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 30, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00485.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1451    most recent
00485.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sahai, V
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, M J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sahai, V
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, M J
Submitted on May 11, 2005
Accepted on November 23, 2005

Processing of vibrotactile inputs from hairy skin by neurons of the dorsal column nuclei in the cat

V Sahai1, D A Mahns1, L Robinson1, N M Perkins1, G T Coleman1, and M J Rowe1*

1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: M.Rowe{at}unsw.edu.au.

The capacity of single neurons of the dorsal column nuclei (DCN) for coding vibrotactile information from the hairy skin has been investigated in anesthetized cats in order to permit quantitative comparison first, with the capacities of DCN neurons responding to glabrous skin vibrotactile inputs, and second, with those of spinocervical tract neurons responding to vibrotactile inputs from hairy skin. Dynamically-sensitive tactile neurons of the DCN whose input came from hairy skin could be divided into two classes, one associated with hair follicle afferent (HFA) input, the other with Pacinian corpuscle (PC) input. The HFA-related class was most sensitive to low-frequency (<50 Hz) vibration and had a graded response output as a function of vibrotactile intensity changes. PC-related neurons had a broader vibrotactile sensitivity, extending to ≥300 Hz and appeared to derive their input from the margins of hairy skin, near the footpads, or from deeper PC sources such as the interosseous membranes or joints. HFA-related neurons had phaselocked responses to vibration frequencies up to ~75 Hz, while PC neurons retained this capacity up to frequencies of ~300 Hz with tightest phaselocking between 50 and 200 Hz. Quantitative measures of phaselocking revealed that the HFA-related neurons provide the better signal of vibrotactile frequency up to ~50 Hz, with a switch-over to the PC-related neurons above that value. In conclusion, the functional capacities of these two classes of cuneate neuron appear to account for behavioral vibrotactile frequency discriminative performance in hairy skin, in contrast to the limited capacities of vibrotactile-sensitive neurons within the spinocervical tract system.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. A. Mahns, N. M. Perkins, V. Sahai, L. Robinson, and M. J. Rowe
Vibrotactile Frequency Discrimination in Human Hairy Skin
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1442 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Sahai, D. A. Mahns, N. M. Perkins, L. Robinson, and M. J. Rowe
Vibrotactile Coding Capacities of Spinocervical Tract Neurons in the Cat
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1465 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.