JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 21, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00504.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/595    most recent
00504.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rabin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lackner, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rabin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lackner, J. R.
Submitted on May 4, 2007
Accepted on November 10, 2007

Influences of arm proprioception and degrees of freedom on postural control with light touch feedback

Ely Rabin1*, Paul A DiZio2, Joel Ventura3, and James R. Lackner3

1 Neuroscience, 1New York College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, New York, United States
2 Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Lab, Brandeis University, MS033, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
3 Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Lab, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: erabin{at}nyit.edu.

Lightly touching a stable surface with one fingertip strongly stabilizes standing posture. The three main features of this phenomenon are: fingertip contact forces maintained at levels too low to provide mechanical support; attenuation of postural sway relative to conditions without fingertip touch; and center of pressure (CP) lags changes in fingertip shear forces by ~250ms. In the experiments presented here, we tested whether accurate arm proprioception and also whether the precision fingertip contact afforded by the many degrees of freedom of the arm are necessary for postural stabilization by finger contact. In our first experiment, we perturbed arm proprioception and control with biceps brachii vibration (120 Hz, 2mm amplitude). This degraded postural control, resulting in greater postural sway amplitudes. In a second study, we immobilized the touching arm with a splint. This prevented precision fingertip contact but had no effect on postural sway amplitude. In both experiments, the correlation and latency of fingertip contact forces to postural sway were unaffected. We conclude that postural control is executed based on information about arm orientation as well as tactile feedback from light touch, although precision fingertip contact is not essential. The consistent correlation and timing of center of pressure movement and fingertip forces across conditions in which postural sway amplitude and fingertip contact are differentially disrupted suggests posture and the fingertip are controlled in parallel with feedback from the fingertip in this task.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.