JN Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 24, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00505.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/4156    most recent
00505.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zaksas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pasternak, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zaksas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pasternak, T.
Submitted on May 16, 2005
Accepted on August 18, 2005

Area MT Neurons Respond to Visual Motion Distant from Their Receptive Fields

Daniel Zaksas and Tatiana Pasternak*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tania{at}cvs.rochester.edu.

Neurons in cortical area MT have localized receptive fields (RF) representing the contralateral hemifield and play an important role in processing visual motion. We recorded the activity of these neurons during a behavioral task in which two monkeys were required to discriminate and remember visual motion presented in the ipsilateral hemifield. During the task the monkeys viewed two stimuli, sample and test, separated by a brief delay and reported whether they contained motion in the same or in opposite directions. 50-70% of MT neurons were activated by the motion stimuli presented in the ipsilateral hemifield, at locations far removed from their classical receptive fields. These responses were in the form of excitation or suppression and were delayed relative to conventional MT responses. Both excitatory and suppressive responses were direction selective but the nature and the timecourse of their directionality differed from the conventional excitatory responses recorded with stimuli in the RF. Direction selectivity of the excitatory remote response was transient and early, while the suppressive response developed later and persisted after stimulus offset. The presence or absence of these unusual responses on error trials, as well as their magnitude, was affected by the behavioral significance of stimuli used in the task. We hypothesize that these responses represent top-down signals from brain region(s) accessing information about stimuli in the entire visual field and about the behavioral state of the animal. The recruitment of neurons in the opposite hemisphere during processing of behaviorally relevant visual signals reveals a mechanism by which sensory processing can be affected by cognitive task demands.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. J. Freedman and J. A. Assad
Distinct Encoding of Spatial and Nonspatial Visual Information in Parietal Cortex
J. Neurosci., April 29, 2009; 29(17): 5671 - 5680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. L. Lui, J. A. Bourne, and M. G. P. Rosa
Spatial Summation, End Inhibition and Side Inhibition in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT)
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1135 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Zaksas and T. Pasternak
Directional Signals in the Prefrontal Cortex and in Area MT during a Working Memory for Visual Motion Task.
J. Neurosci., November 8, 2006; 26(45): 11726 - 11742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.