| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Psychology, Princeton University, 08540, New Jersey, United States; CSBMB, Princeton University, 08540, New Jersey, United States
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: skastner{at}princeton.edu.
Selective attention modulates neural activity in the visual system both in the presence and in the absence of stimuli. When subjects direct attention to a location in a scene anticipating the stimulus onset, there is an increase in baseline activity. How do such baseline increases relate to the attentional modulation of stimulus-driven activity? Using fMRI, we demonstrate that baseline increases related to the expectation of motion or color stimuli at a peripheral target location do not predict the modulation of neural responses evoked by these stimuli when attended. In areas such as MT and TEO that were more effectively activated by one stimulus type than the other, attentional modulation of visually evoked activity depended on the stimulus preference of a visual area and was stronger for the effective than for the non-effective stimulus. Baseline increases did not reflect the stimulus preference of a visual area. These signals were shown to be spatially specific and appeared to be dominated by the location information, and not by the feature information of the cue with the experimental paradigms under study. These findings provide evidence that baseline increases in visual cortex during cue periods do not reflect the activation of a memory template that includes particular stimulus properties of the expected target, but rather carry information about the location of an expected target stimulus. In addition, when the stimulus contained both color and motion, an object-based attention effect was observed, with significant attentional modulation in the area that responded preferentially to the unattended feature.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Esterman and S. Yantis Perceptual Expectation Evokes Category-Selective Cortical Activity Cereb Cortex, September 16, 2009; (2009) bhp188v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Mirpour and H. Esteky State-Dependent Effects of Stimulus Presentation Duration on the Temporal Dynamics of Neural Responses in the Inferotemporal Cortex of Macaque Monkeys J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1790 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Sylvester, G. L. Shulman, A. I. Jack, and M. Corbetta Anticipatory and Stimulus-Evoked Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Modulations Related to Spatial Attention Reflect a Common Additive Signal J. Neurosci., August 26, 2009; 29(34): 10671 - 10682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. A. Busch, J. Dubois, and R. VanRullen The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7869 - 7876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Hesselmann, C. A. Kell, and A. Kleinschmidt Ongoing Activity Fluctuations in hMT+ Bias the Perception of Coherent Visual Motion J. Neurosci., December 31, 2008; 28(53): 14481 - 14485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Sylvester, A. I. Jack, M. Corbetta, and G. L. Shulman Anticipatory Suppression of Nonattended Locations in Visual Cortex Marks Target Location and Predicts Perception J. Neurosci., June 25, 2008; 28(26): 6549 - 6556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
