JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 26, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00539.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/3505    most recent
00539.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bandyopadhyay, S.
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bandyopadhyay, S.
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. D
Submitted on May 14, 2007
Accepted on September 18, 2007

A receptive field for dorsal cochlear nucleus neurons at multiple sound levels

Sharba Bandyopadhyay1, Lina A.J. Reiss2, and Eric D Young1*

1 Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
2 Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States; Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 505 Traylor Building, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: eyoung{at}jhu.edu.

Neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) exhibit nonlinearities in spectral processing, which make it difficult to predict the neurons’ responses to stimuli. Here, we consider two possible sources of nonlinearity: non-monotonic responses as sound level increases due to inhibition; and interactions between frequency components. A spectral weighting function model of rate responses is used; the model approximates the neuron’s rate response as a weighted sum of the frequency components of the stimulus plus a 2nd-order sum that captures interactions between frequencies. Such models approximate DCN neurons well at low spectral contrast, i.e. when the standard deviation (contrast) of the stimulus spectrum is limited to 3 dB. This model is compared to a 1st-order sum with weights that are explicit functions of sound level, so that the low contrast model is extended to spectral contrasts of 12 dB, the range of natural stimuli. The sound-level dependent weights improve prediction performance at large spectral contrast. However, the interactions between frequencies, represented as 2nd-order terms, are more important at low spectral contrast. The level-dependent model is shown to predict previously described patterns of responses to spectral edges, showing that small changes in the inhibitory components of the receptive field can produce large changes in the responses of the neuron to features of natural stimuli. These results provide an effective way of characterizing nonlinear auditory neurons incorporating stimulus-dependent sensitivity changes. Such models could be used for neurons in other sensory systems, which show similar effects.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. A. Lesica and B. Grothe
Dynamic Spectrotemporal Feature Selectivity in the Auditory Midbrain
J. Neurosci., May 21, 2008; 28(21): 5412 - 5421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.