|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 The Leslie and Susan Gonda (Goldschmied) Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
2 The Leslie and Susan Gonda (Goldschmied) Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel; Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
3 ; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hurvitz3000{at}hotmail.com.
Tonic stimuli can elicit phasic responses. The neural circuit underlying Aplysia californica consummatory feeding was used to examine how a maintained stimulus elicits repetitive, phasic movements. The command-like cerebral-buccal interneuron 2 (CBI-2) is excited by tonic food stimuli, but initiates rhythmic consummatory responses by exciting only protraction-phase neurons, which then excite retraction-phase neurons after a delay. CBI-2 is inhibited during retraction, generally preventing it from exciting protraction phase neurons during the wrong phase, retraction. We have found that depolarizing CBI-2 during retraction overcomes the inhibition and causes CBI-2 to fire, potentially leading CBI-2 to excite protraction phase neurons during retraction. However, CBI-2 synaptic outputs to protraction phase neurons were blocked during retraction, thereby preventing excitation during the wrong phase. The block was caused by presynaptic inhibition of CBI-2 by a key buccal ganglion retraction phase interneuron, B64, which also causes post-synaptic inhibition of protraction-phase neurons. Presynaptic and post-synaptic inhibition could be separated. First, only presynaptic inhibition affected facilitation of EPSPs from CBI-2 to its followers. Second, a newly identified neuron, B54, produced post-synaptic inhibition similar to that of B64, but did not cause pre-synaptic inhibition. Third, in some target neurons B64 produced only presynaptic, but not post-synaptic inhibition. Blocking CBI-2 transmitter release in the buccal ganglia during retraction functions to prevent CBI-2 from driving retraction phase neurons in the wrong phase, and regulates the facilitation of the CBI-2 induced EPSPs in protraction phase neurons. It may also permit CBI-2 to have different effects in different ganglia.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Hurwitz, A. Ophir, A. Korngreen, J. Koester, and A. J. Susswein Currents Contributing to Decision Making in Neurons B31/B32 of Aplysia J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 814 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sasaki, M. R. Due, J. Jing, and K. R. Weiss Feeding CPG in Aplysia Directly Controls Two Distinct Outputs of a Compartmentalized Interneuron That Functions as a CPG Element J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3796 - 3801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-s. Wu, M. R. Due, K. Sasaki, A. Proekt, J. Jing, and K. R. Weiss State Dependence of Spike Timing and Neuronal Function in a Motor Pattern Generating Network J. Neurosci., October 3, 2007; 27(40): 10818 - 10831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Koh and K. R. Weiss Activity-Dependent Peptidergic Modulation of the Plateau-Generating Neuron B64 in the Feeding Network of Aplysia J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1862 - 1867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |