JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 10, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00569.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/6/3987    most recent
00569.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shoykhet, M.
Right arrow Articles by Simons, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shoykhet, M.
Right arrow Articles by Simons, D. J.
Submitted on May 31, 2005
Accepted on August 8, 2005

Whisker Trimming Begun at Birth or on Postnatal Day 12 Affects Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields of Layer IV Barrel Neurons

Michael Shoykhet1, Peter W. Land1, and Daniel J. Simons1*

1 Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cortex{at}pitt.edu.

In rats, whisker trimming during development leads to persistent alterations in the function of cortical barrel circuits and to behavioral deficits later in life. Here we examined how whisker trimming begun either at birth (P0) or on postnatal day 12 (P12), around the onset of whisking behavior, affects receptive fields of layer IV barrel neurons. All whiskers on the left face were trimmed for 40-45 days and then allowed to regrow fully. Extracellular single-unit recordings and controlled deflections of principal and adjacent whiskers (PW, AW) individually or in paired combinations were used to assess excitatory and suppressive effects of neighboring whiskers on barrel neurons. Results indicate that whisker trimming both from P0 and from P12 leads to enlarged excitatory and weakened inhibitory receptive fields in layer IV neurons. PW- and AW -evoked responses are larger in magnitude in trimmed than in control animals; AW-evoked responses are disproportionately affected, decreasing the spatial focus of barrel neurons. Deprivation after P12 accounts for approximately 50 percent of the total effect observed in P0 trimmed animals. Suppressive interactions, evoked by two whiskers deflected in succession, are weaker in trimmed than in control animals. Suppressive caudal/rostral and ventral/dorsal gradients, however, appear unaffected by sensory deprivation. Thus, the developmental period during which experience persistently modifies maturing barrel circuitry extends up to and likely beyond the onset of whisking behavior. Sensory deprivation during this time affects development of both excitatory and inhibitory receptive fields of barrel neurons and likely impairs cortical integration of sensory information from multiple whiskers.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Shoykhet and D. J. Simons
Development of Thalamocortical Response Transformations in the Rat Whisker-Barrel System
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 356 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.-H. Lee, P. W. Land, and D. J. Simons
Layer- and Cell-Type-Specific Effects of Neonatal Whisker-Trimming in Adult Rat Barrel Cortex
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4380 - 4385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. A. McRae, M. M. Rocco, G. Kelly, J. C. Brumberg, and R. T. Matthews
Sensory Deprivation Alters Aggrecan and Perineuronal Net Expression in the Mouse Barrel Cortex
J. Neurosci., May 16, 2007; 27(20): 5405 - 5413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Jiao, C. Zhang, Y. Yanagawa, and Q.-Q. Sun
Major Effects of Sensory Experiences on the Neocortical Inhibitory Circuits.
J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8691 - 8701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.