JN AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (July 18, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00570.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1815    most recent
00570.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernier, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Blouin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernier, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Blouin, J.
Submitted on May 22, 2007
Accepted on July 11, 2007

Evidence for distinct, differentially adaptable sensorimotor transformations for reaches to visual and proprioceptive targets

Pierre-Michel Bernier1, Gabriel M. Gauthier2, and Jean Blouin3*

1 Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de la Cognition, CNRS & Aix Marseille Universite, Marseille, France; UMR Mouvement & Perception, CNRS & Aix Marseille Universite, Marseille, France
2 UMR Mouvement & Perception, CNRS & Aix Marseille Universite, Marseille, France
3 Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de la Cognition, CNRS & Aix Marseille Universite, Marseille, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jean.blouin{at}univ-provence.fr.

Recent evidence suggests that planning a reaching movement entails similar stages and common networks irrespective of whether the target location is defined through visual or proprioceptive cues. Here we test whether the transformations that convert the sensory information regarding target location into the required motor output are common for both types of reaches. To do so, we adaptively modified these sensorimotor transformations through exposure to displacing prisms, and hypothesized that if they are common to both types of reaches, then the after-effects observed for reaches to visual targets would generalize to reaches to a proprioceptive target. Subjects (n = 16) were divided into two groups that differed with respect to the sensory modality of the targets (visual or proprioceptive) used in the pre- and post-tests. The adaptation phase was identical for both groups, and consisted of movements toward visual targets while wearing 10.5 degree horizontally displacing prisms. We observed large after-effects consistent with the magnitude of the prism-induced shift when reaching toward visual targets in the post-test, but no significant after-effects for movements toward the proprioceptive target. These results provide evidence that distinct, differentially adaptable sensorimotor transformations underlie the planning of reaches to visual and proprioceptive targets.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P.-M. Bernier, B. Burle, F. Vidal, T. Hasbroucq, and J. Blouin
Direct Evidence for Cortical Suppression of Somatosensory Afferents during Visuomotor Adaptation
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2009; 19(9): 2106 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.