JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 20, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00575.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/6/3492    most recent
00575.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by David, S. V
Right arrow Articles by Gallant, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by David, S. V
Right arrow Articles by Gallant, J.
Submitted on May 31, 2006
Accepted on September 12, 2006

Spectral receptive field properties explain shape selectivity in area V4

Stephen V David1, Benjamin Y Hayden2, and Jack Gallant3*

1 Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States
2 Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
3 Psychology and Neuroscience, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gallant{at}berkeley.edu.

Neurons in cortical area V4 respond selectively to complex visual patterns such as curved contours and non-Cartesian gratings. Most previous experiments in V4 have measured responses to small, idiosyncratic stimulus sets, and no single functional model yet accounts for all of the disparate results. We propose that one model, the spectral receptive field (SRF), can explain many observations of selectivity in V4. The SRF describes tuning in terms of the orientation and spatial frequency spectrum and can, in principle, predict the response to any visual stimulus. We estimated SRFs for neurons in V4 of awake primates by linearized reverse correlation of responses to a large set of natural images. We find that V4 neurons have large orientation and spatial frequency bandwidth and often bimodal orientation tuning. For comparison, we estimated SRFs for neurons in primary visual cortex (V1). Consistent with previous observations, we find that V1 neurons have narrower bandwidth than V4. To determine whether estimated SRFs can account for previous observations of selectivity, we used them to predict responses to Cartesian gratings, non-Cartesian gratings, natural images and curved contours. Based on these predictions, we find that the majority of neurons in V1 are selective for Cartesian gratings while the majority of V4 neurons are selective for non-Cartesian gratings or natural images. The SRF describes visual tuning properties with a second order nonlinear model. These results support the hypothesis that a second order model is sufficient to describe the general mechanisms mediating shape selectivity in area V4.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. M. N. Woolley, P. R. Gill, T. Fremouw, and F. E. Theunissen
Functional Groups in the Avian Auditory System
J. Neurosci., March 4, 2009; 29(9): 2780 - 2793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
T. S Meese and R. J Summers
Area summation in human vision at and above detection threshold
Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2007; 274(1627): 2891 - 2900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Cadieu, M. Kouh, A. Pasupathy, C. E. Connor, M. Riesenhuber, and T. Poggio
A Model of V4 Shape Selectivity and Invariance
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1733 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.