JN AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 17, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00578.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/3538    most recent
00578.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varela, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varela, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, S. M.
Submitted on May 22, 2007
Accepted on October 11, 2007

Differences in Response to Muscarinic Agonists Between First and Higher Order Thalamic Relays

Carmen Varela1 and S. Murray Sherman1*

1 Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: msherman{at}bsd.uchicago.edu.

The mammalian thalamus is composed of two types of thalamocortical relay. First order relays receive information from subcortical sources and relay it to cortex, whereas higher order relays receive information from layer 5 of one cortical area and relay it to another. Recent reports suggest that modulatory inputs to first and higher order relays may differ. We used rat thalamic brain slices and whole-cell recordings from relay cells in various first order (the lateral geniculate nucleus, the ventral posterior nucleus, and the ventral portion of the medial geniculate body) and higher order relays (the lateral posterior, the posterior medial nucleus, and the dorsal portion of the medial geniculate body) to explore their responses to activation of muscarinic receptors. We found that, while all first order relay cells show a depolarizing response to muscarinic agonists, about 20% of higher order relay cells respond with hyperpolarization. The depolarization is accompanied by an overall increase in input resistance while the hyperpolarization correlates with a decrease in resistance. Since activation of cholinergic brainstem afferents to thalamus increases with increasing behavioral vigilance, the findings suggest that increased vigilance will depolarize all first order and most higher order relay cells but will hyperpolarize a significant subset of higher order relay cells. Such hyperpolarization is expected to bias these relay cells to the burst firing mode, and so these results are consistent with evidence of more bursting among higher order than first order relay cells.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. Varela and S. M. Sherman
Differences in Response to Serotonergic Activation between First and Higher Order Thalamic Nuclei
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2009; 19(8): 1776 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Masri, R. L. Quiton, J. M. Lucas, P. D. Murray, S. M. Thompson, and A. Keller
Zona Incerta: A Role in Central Pain
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 181 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
Y.-W. Lam and S. M. Sherman
Functional Organization of the Somatosensory Cortical Layer 6 Feedback to the Thalamus
Cereb Cortex, May 15, 2009; (2009) bhp077v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.