JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 5, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00585.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/5/2622    most recent
00585.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Luebke, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Luebke, J. I.
Submitted on May 23, 2007
Accepted on August 31, 2007

Electrophysiological Diversity of Layer 5 Pyramidal Cells in the Prefrontal Cortex of the Rhesus Monkey: In Vitro Slice Studies

Yu-Ming Chang1 and Jennifer Irene Luebke1*

1 Anatomy & Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jluebke{at}bu.edu.

Whole cell patch clamp recordings were employed to characterize the electrophysiological properties of layer 5 pyramidal cells in slices of the prefrontal cortex (Area 46) of the rhesus monkey. Four electrophysiologically distinct cell types were discriminated based on distinctive repetitive action potential (AP) firing patterns and single AP characteristics: regular-spiking slowly-adapting type-1 cells (RS1; 62%), regular spiking slowly-adapting type-2 cells (RS2; 18%), regular spiking fast-adapting cells (FA; 15%), and intrinsically bursting cells (IB; 5%). Cell types did not differ with regard to their location in layer 5 or in their dendritic morphology. In RS1 cells, AP threshold and amplitude did not change significantly during a 2 second spike train, whereas in RS2 and FA cells AP threshold increased significantly and AP amplitude decreased significantly during the train. In FA cells, complete adaptation of AP firing was observed within 600 ms. IB cells displayed an all-or-none burst of 3-6 APs, followed by RS1-type firing behavior. RS1 cells could be further subdivided into 3 subtypes. Low threshold spiking (LTS) RS1 cells exhibited an initial doublet at the onset of a spike train and a prominent depolarizing afterpotential (DAP); intermediate RS1 cells (IM) exhibited a DAP, but no initial doublet, and non-LTS RS1 cells exhibited neither a DAP nor an initial doublet. RS2 and FA cells did not exhibit DAPs or initial doublets. The distinctive firing patterns of these diverse layer 5 pyramidal cells may reflect different roles played by these cells in the mediation of subcortical neuronal activity by the dorsolateral PFC.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.