JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 19, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00595.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/5/2566    most recent
00595.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mc Laughlin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Joris, P. X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mc Laughlin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Joris, P. X.
Submitted on May 25, 2007
Accepted on September 18, 2007

Comparison of bandwidths in the inferior colliculus and the auditory nerve. I: Measurement using a spectrally manipulated stimulus

Myles Mc Laughlin1*, Bram Van de Sande1, Marcel van der Heijden1, and Philip X. Joris2

1 Neurophysiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2 Neuroscience, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Neurophysiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: myles.mclaughlin{at}med.kuleuven.be.

A defining feature of auditory systems across animal divisions is the ability to sort different frequency components of a sound into separate neural frequency channels. Narrowband filtering in the auditory periphery is of obvious advantage for the representation of sound spectrum, and manifests itself pervasively in human psychophysical studies as the critical band. Peripheral filtering also alters coding of the temporal waveform, so that temporal responses in the auditory periphery reflect both the stimulus waveform and peripheral filtering. Temporal coding is essential for the measurement of the time delay between waveforms at the two ears - a critical component of sound localization. A number of human psychophysical studies have shown a wider effective critical bandwidth with binaural stimuli than with monaural stimuli. However, other studies found no difference. Here we directly compare binaural and monaural bandwidths (BW) in the anesthetised cat. We measure monaural BW in the auditory nerve (AN) and binaural BW in the inferior colliculus (IC) using spectrally manipulated broadband noise and response metrics that reflect spike-timing. The stimulus was a pair of noise tokens which were interaurally in phase for all frequencies below a certain flip frequency (fflip) and which had an interaural phase difference of {pi} above fflip. The response was measured as a function of fflip and, using a separate stimulus protocol, as a function of interaural correlation. We find that both AN and IC filter BW depend on characteristic frequency, but that there is no difference in mean BW between the AN and IC.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.