JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 10, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.00601.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Videos
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/4/2104    most recent
00601.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perge, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Wezel, R. J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perge, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Wezel, R. J. A.
Submitted on June 14, 2004
Accepted on November 3, 2004

Temporal dynamics of direction tuning in motion sensitive macaque area MT

Janos A. Perge, Bart G. Borghuis, Roger J. E. Bours, Martin J. M. Lankheet, and Richard J. A. van Wezel*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.j.a.vanwezel{at}bio.uu.nl.

We studied the temporal dynamics of motion direction sensitivity in macaque area MT using a motion reverse correlation paradigm. Stimuli consisted of a random sequence of motion steps in eight different directions. Cross-correlating the stimulus with the resulting neural activity reveals the temporal dynamics of direction selectivity. The temporal dynamics of direction selectivity at the preferred speed showed two phases along the time axis: one phase corresponding to an increase in probability for the preferred direction at short latencies, and a second phase corresponding to a decrease in probability for the preferred direction at longer latencies. The strength of this biphasic behavior varied between neurons from weak to very strong and was uniformly distributed. Strong biphasic behavior suggests optimal responses for motion steps in the anti-preferred direction followed by a motion step in the preferred direction. Correlating spikes to combinations of motion directions corroborates this distinction. The optimal combination for weakly biphasic cells consists of successive steps in the preferred direction whereas for strongly biphasic cells it is a reversal of directions. Comparing reverse correlograms to combinations of stimuli to predictions based on correlograms for individual directions revealed several non-linear effects. Correlations for successive presentations of preferred directions were smaller than predicted, which could be explained by a static non-linearity (saturation). Correlations to pairs of (nearly) opposite directions were larger than predicted. These results show that MT neurons are generally more responsive when sudden changes in motion directions occur, irrespective of the preferred direction of the neurons. The latter non-linearities cannot be explained by a simple static non-linearity at the output of the neuron, but most likely reflect network interactions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. F. Soechting and M. Flanders
Extrapolation of Visual Motion for Manual Interception
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2956 - 2967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Neri
Fast-scale adaptive changes of directional tuning in fly tangential cells are explained by a static nonlinearity
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3199 - 3208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Tadin, J. S. Lappin, and R. Blake
Fine temporal properties of center-surround interactions in motion revealed by reverse correlation.
J. Neurosci., March 8, 2006; 26(10): 2614 - 2622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.