JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 3, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.00611.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/3/1501    most recent
00611.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Paige, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Paige, G. D.
Submitted on June 27, 2003
Accepted on November 26, 2003

Anticipatory VOR suppression induced by visual and non-visual stimuli in humans

Graham R. Barnes* and Gary D. Paige

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.r.barnes{at}umist.ac.uk.

We compared the predictive behaviour of smooth pursuit (SP) and suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in humans by examining anticipatory smooth eye movements, a phenomenon that arises after repeated presentations of sudden target movement preceded by an auditory warning cue. We investigated whether anticipatory smooth eye movements also occur prior to cued head motion, particularly when subjects expect interaction between the VOR and either real or imagined head-fixed targets. Subjects were presented with horizontal motion stimuli consisting of a visual target alone (SP), head motion in darkness (VOR), or head motion in the presence of a real or imagined head-fixed target (HFT and IHFT, respectively). Stimulus sequences were delivered as single cycles of a velocity sinusoid (frequency 0.5Hz or 1.0Hz) that were either cued (a sound cue 400ms earlier) or non-cued. For SP, anticipatory smooth eye movements developed over repeated trials in the cued, but not the non-cued, condition. In the VOR condition, no such anticipatory eye movements were observed, even when cued. In contrast, anticipatory responses were observed under cued, but not non-cued, HFT and IHFT conditions, as for SP. Anticipatory HFT responses increased in proportion to the velocity of preceding stimuli. In general, anticipatory gaze responses were similar in cued SP, HFT and IHFT conditions and were appropriate for expected target motion in space. Anticipatory responses may represent the output of a central mechanism for smooth eye movement generation that operates during predictive SP as well as VOR modulations that are linked with SP even in the absence of real visual targets.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.