JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 27, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00618.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1287    most recent
00618.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudry, K. S
Right arrow Articles by Reinagel, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudry, K. S
Right arrow Articles by Reinagel, P.
Submitted on June 13, 2006
Accepted on June 26, 2007

Contrast adaptation in a non-adapting LGN model

Kate S Gaudry1 and Pamela Reinagel1*

1 Neurobiology, UCSD, La Jolla, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: preinagel{at}ucsd.edu.

Sensory neurons appear to adapt their gain to match the variance of signals along the dimension they encode, a property we shall call "contrast normalization". Contrast normalization has been the subject of extensive physiological and theoretical study. We previously found that neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) exhibit contrast normalization in their responses to full-field flickering white-noise stimuli, and that neurons with the strongest contrast normalization best preserved information transmission across a range of contrasts. We have also shown that both of these properties could be reproduced by non-adapting model cells. Here we present a detailed comparison of this non-adapting model to physiological data from the LGN. First, the model cells recapitulated other contrast dependencies of LGN responses: decreasing stimulus contrast resulted in an increase in spike-timing jitter and spike-number variability. Second, we find that the extent of contrast normalization in this model depends on model parameters related to refractoriness and to noise. Third, we show that the model cells exhibit rapid, transient changes in firing rate just after changes in contrast, and that this is sufficient to produce the transient changes in information transmission that have been reported in other neurons. It is known that intrinsic properties of neurons change upon contrast adaptation. Nevertheless the model demonstrates that the spiking nonlinearity of neurons can produce many of the temporal aspects of contrast gain control, including normalization to input variance and transient effects of contrast change.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. L. Beaudoin, M. B. Manookin, and J. B. Demb
Distinct expressions of contrast gain control in parallel synaptic pathways converging on a retinal ganglion cell
J. Physiol., November 15, 2008; 586(22): 5487 - 5502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. B. Demb
Functional circuitry of visual adaptation in the retina
J. Physiol., September 15, 2008; 586(18): 4377 - 4384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.