|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Lehrstuhl fuer Zoologie, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Garching, Germany
2 Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Christine.Koeppl{at}bio.tum.de.
The cochlear nucleus angularis (NA) is widely assumed to form the starting point of a brainstem pathway for processing sound intensity in birds. Details of its function are unclear, however, and its evolutionary origin and relationship to the mammalian cochlear-nucleus complex are obscure. We have carried out extracellular single-unit recordings in the NA of ketamine-anaesthetized barn owls. The aim was to re-evaluate the extent of heterogeneity in NA physiology, since recent studies of cellular morphology had established several distinct types. Extensive characterization, using tuning curves, phase locking, peri-stimulus time histograms and rate-level functions for pure tones and noise, revealed 5 major response types. The most common one was a primary-like pattern that was distinguished from auditory-nerve fibres by showing lower vector strengths of phase locking and/or lower spontaneous rates. Two types of chopper responses were found (chopper-transient and a rare chopper-sustained), as well as onset units. Finally, we routinely encountered a complex response type with a pronounced inhibitory component, similar to the mammalian typeIV. Evidence is presented that this range of response types is representative for birds and that earlier conflicting reports may be due to methodological differences. All 5 response types defined were similar to well-known types in the mammalian cochlear nucleus. This suggests convergent evolution of neurones specialized for encoding different, behaviourally-relevant features of the auditory stimulus. It remains to be investigated whether the different response types correlate with morphological types and whether they establish different processing streams in the auditory brainstem of birds.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Nishino, R. Yamada, H. Kuba, H. Hioki, T. Furuta, T. Kaneko, and H. Ohmori Sound-Intensity-Dependent Compensation for the Small Interaural Time Difference Cue for Sound Source Localization J. Neurosci., July 9, 2008; 28(28): 7153 - 7164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yang and A. S. Feng Heterogeneous Biophysical Properties of Frog Dorsal Medullary Nucleus (Cochlear Nucleus) Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 1953 - 1964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. MacLeod, T. K. Horiuchi, and C. E. Carr A Role for Short-Term Synaptic Facilitation and Depression in the Processing of Intensity Information in the Auditory Brain Stem J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2863 - 2874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. MacLeod and C. E. Carr Synaptic Physiology in the Cochlear Nucleus Angularis of the Chick J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2520 - 2529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. G. Louage, M. van der Heijden, and P. X. Joris Enhanced Temporal Response Properties of Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus Neurons to Broadband Noise J. Neurosci., February 9, 2005; 25(6): 1560 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday Response Properties of Single Neurons in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Response Patterns, Frequency Coding, Intensity Coding, and Spike Latencies J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 136 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |