JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 8, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.00640.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/2/656    most recent
00640.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, I.
Right arrow Articles by Manor, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, I.
Right arrow Articles by Manor, Y.
Submitted on June 24, 2004
Accepted on September 1, 2004

Synaptic depression in conjunction with A-current channels promote phase constancy in a rhythmic network

Idan Greenberg and Yair Manor*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yairman{at}bgumail.bgu.ac.il.

In many central pattern generators, pairs of neurons maintain an approximately fixed phase despite large changes in the frequency. The mechanisms underlying phase maintenance are not clear. Previous theoretical work suggested that inhibitory synapses that show short-term depression could play a critical role in this respect. In this work we examine how the interaction between synaptic depression and the kinetics of a transient potassium (A-like) current could be advantageous for phase constancy in a rhythmic network. To demonstrate the mechanism in the context of a realistic central pattern generator, we constructed a detailed model of the crustacean pyloric circuit. The frequency of the rhythm was modified by changing the level of a ligand-activated current in one of the pyloric neurons. We examined how the time difference of firing activities between two selected neurons in this circuit is affected by synaptic depression, A-current and a combination of the two. We tuned the parameters of the model such that with synaptic depression alone, or A-current alone, phase was not maintained between these two neurons. However, when these two components came together, they acted synergistically to maintain the phase across a wide range of cycle periods. This suggests that synaptic depression may be necessary to allow an A-current to delay a postsynaptic neuron in a frequency-dependent manner, such that phase invariance is ensured.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Rabbah and F. Nadim
Synaptic Dynamics Do Not Determine Proper Phase of Activity in a Central Pattern Generator
J. Neurosci., December 7, 2005; 25(49): 11269 - 11278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.