JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 15, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00652.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/1/795    most recent
00652.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, C. J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gilchrist, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, C. J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gilchrist, I. D.
Submitted on June 22, 2006
Accepted on November 9, 2006

A population coding account for systematic variation in saccadic dead time

Casimir Johannes Hendrikus Ludwig1*, John W Mildinhall1, and Iain Donald Gilchrist1

1 Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.ludwig{at}bristol.ac.uk.

During movement programming, there is a point in time at which the movement system is committed to executing an action with certain parameters, even though new information may render this action obsolete. For saccades programmed to a visual target this period is termed the dead time. Using a double-step paradigm we examined potential variability in the dead time with variations in 1) overall saccade latency, and 2) spatio-temporal configuration of two sequential targets. In experiment 1 we varied overall saccade latency by manipulating the presence or absence of a central fixation point. Despite a large and robust gap effect, decreasing the saccade latency in this way did not alter the dead time. In experiment 2 we varied the separation between the two targets. The dead time increased with separation up to a point, and then levelled off. A stochastic accumulator model of the oculomotor decision mechanism accounts comprehensively for our findings. The model predicts a gap effect through changes in baseline activity, without producing variations in the dead time. Variations in dead time with separation between the two target locations are a natural consequence of the population coding assumption in the model.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.