|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fskinner{at}uhnres.utoronto.ca.
Gap junctions allow direct electrical communication between CNS neurons. From theoretical and modeling studies it is well-known that although gap junctions can act to synchronize network output, they can also give rise to many other dynamic patterns including antiphase and other phase-locked states. The particular network pattern that arises depends on cellular, intrinsic properties which affect firing frequencies, as well as the strength and location of the gap junctions. Interneurons or GABAergic neurons in hippocampus are diverse in their cellular characteristics, and have been shown to have active dendrites. Furthermore, parvalbumin-positive GABAergic neurons, also known as basket cells, can contact one another via gap junctions on their distal dendrites. Using two-cell network models, we explore how distal electrical connections affect network output. We build multi-compartment models of hippocampal basket cells using NEURON, and endow them with varying amounts of active dendrites. Two-cell networks of these model cells as well as reduced versions are explored. The relationship between intrinsic frequency and the level of active dendrites allows us to define three regions based on what sort of network dynamics occur with distal gap junction coupling. Weak coupling theory is used to predict the delineation of these regions, as well as examination of phase response curves and distal dendritic polarization levels. We find that a non-monotonic dependence of network dynamic characteristics (phase lags) on gap junction conductance occurs. This suggests that distal electrical coupling and active dendrite levels can control how sensitive network dynamics are to gap junction modulation. With the extended geometry, gap junctions located at more distal locations must have larger conductances for pure synchrony to occur. Furthermore, based on simulations with heterogeneous networks, it may be that one requires active dendrites if phase-locking is to occur in networks formed with distal gap junctions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. C. Stacey, M. T. Lazarewicz, and B. Litt Synaptic Noise and Physiological Coupling Generate High-Frequency Oscillations in a Hippocampal Computational Model J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2342 - 2357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Haneda and Y. Oka Coordinated Synchronization in the Electrically Coupled Network of Terminal Nerve Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons as Demonstrated by Double Patch-Clamp Study Endocrinology, July 1, 2008; 149(7): 3540 - 3548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gansert, J. Golowasch, and F. Nadim Sustained Rhythmic Activity in Gap-Junctionally Coupled Networks of Model Neurons Depends on the Diameter of Coupled Dendrites J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3450 - 3460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukuda Structural Organization of the Gap Junction Network in the Cerebral Cortex Neuroscientist, June 1, 2007; 13(3): 199 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Mancilla, T. J. Lewis, D. J. Pinto, J. Rinzel, and B. W. Connors Synchronization of Electrically Coupled Pairs of Inhibitory Interneurons in Neocortex J. Neurosci., February 21, 2007; 27(8): 2058 - 2073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |