JN Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 16, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00669.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/3449    most recent
00669.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dasika, V. K
Right arrow Articles by Colburn, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dasika, V. K
Right arrow Articles by Colburn, H. S.
Submitted on June 24, 2005
Accepted on July 26, 2006

Simple models show the general advantages of dendrites in coincidence detection

Vasant K Dasika1*, John A. White2, and H. Steve Colburn1

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Hearing Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Center for BioDynamics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vasant.dasika{at}gmail.com.

Dendrites can influence and improve information processing in single neurons. Here, simple models are used to elucidate mechanisms underlying the dendritic enhancement of coincidence detection. We focus on coincidence detecting cells in the auditory system, which have bipolar dendrites and show acute sensitivity to interaural time difference, a critical cue for spatial hearing. A three-compartment model consisting of a single-compartment soma and two single-compartment dendrites is primarily used, although multiple compartment dendrites are also tested. Two varieties of somata, with and without active ion channels, are studied. Using constant conductance inputs, we show analytically that the somatic response to balanced bilateral inputs is largest, while the response monotonically decreases as the input distribution becomes increasingly monolateral. This enhancement is a consequence of the sublinear saturating dendritic voltage response to conductance input and occurs when dendrites are composed of a single, a finite number, or an infinite number (i.e., a cable) of compartments. Longer, thinner dendrites or greater numbers of compartments increase the enhancement of the somatic response to bilateral input. The time-independent dendritic enhancement, moreover, underlies improved coincidence detection of time-varying input. Coincidence-sensitivity to a pair of conductance pulses and rate-ITD modulation to low-frequency (400 Hz) periodic inputs increases with dendritic length. These findings are related to the length gradient in the avian system, where low characteristic frequency (CF) cells have long dendrites and high CF cells have short dendrites. We conclude that dendrites fundamentally improve coincidence detection, increasing the computational power of many neurons in the nervous system.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.