JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (June 22, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00671.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/5/3058    most recent
00671.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shemmell, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shemmell, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, R. G.
Submitted on July 2, 2004
Accepted on June 11, 2005

Neuromuscular adaptation during skill acquisition on a two degree-of-freedom target acquisition task: dynamic movement

Jonathan B. Shemmell1*, James R. Tresilian1, Stephan Riek1, Benjamin K. Barry1, and Richard G. Carson1

1 School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jshemm{at}bu.edu.

In this experiment, we examined the extent to which the spatiotemporal reorganisation of muscle synergies mediates skill acquisition on a two degree-of-freedom (d.f) target acquisition task. Eight participants completed five practice sessions on consecutive days. During each session they practised movements to eight target positions presented via a visual display. The movements required combinations of flexion/extension and pronation/supination of the elbow joint complex. During practice sessions, eight targets displaced 5.4cm from the start position (representing joint excursions of 54°), were presented 16 times. During pre- and post-tests, participants acquired the targets at two distances (3.6cm [36° ] and 7.2cm [72° ]). EMG data were recorded from eight muscles contributing to the movements during the pre- and post-tests. Most targets were acquired more rapidly following the practice period. Performance improvements were, in most target directions, accompanied by increases in the smoothness of the movement trajectories. When target acquisition required movement in both d.f., there were also practice-related decreases in the extent to which the trajectories deviated from a direct path to the target. The contribution of monofunctional muscles (those producing torque in a single d.f.) increased with practice during movements in which they acted as agonists. The activity in bifunctional muscles (those contributing torque in both d.f.) remained at pre-test levels in most movements. The results suggest that performance gains were mediated primarily by changes in the spatial organisation of muscles synergies. These changes were expressed most prominently in terms of the magnitude of activation of the monofunctional muscles.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. Duchateau, J. G. Semmler, and R. M. Enoka
Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2006; 101(6): 1766 - 1775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. G. Carson
Changes in muscle coordination with training
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1506 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.