JN AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 26, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00684.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/2/914    most recent
00684.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, E. P.
Submitted on June 30, 2005
Accepted on October 20, 2005

Corticospinal excitability is lower during rhythmic arm movement than during tonic contraction

Timothy J. Carroll1*, Evan R. L. Baldwin1, David F. Collins1, and E. Paul Zehr1

1 School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: t.carroll{at}unsw.edu.au.

Humans perform rhythmic, locomotor movements with the arms and legs every day. Studies using reflexes to probe the functional role of the CNS suggest that spinal circuits are an important part of the neural control system for rhythmic arm cycling and walking. Here, by studying motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, and H-reflexes induced by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves, we show a reduction in corticospinal excitability during rhythmic arm movement compared with tonic, voluntary contraction. Responses were compared between arm cycling and tonic contraction at four positions, while participants generated similar levels of muscle activity. Both H-reflexes and MEPs were significantly smaller during arm cycling than during tonic contraction at the mid-point of arm-flexion (F = 13.51, p = 0.006; F = 11.83, p = 0.009). Sub-threshold TMS significantly facilitated the FCR H-reflex during tonic contractions, but did not significantly modulate H-reflex amplitude during arm cycling. The data indicate a reduction in the responsiveness of cells comprising the fast, monosynaptic, corticospinal pathway during arm cycling, and suggest that the motor cortex may contribute less to motor drive during rhythmic arm movement than during tonic, voluntary contraction. Our results are consistent with the idea that sub-cortical regions contribute to the control of rhythmic arm movements despite highly developed corticospinal projections to the human upper limb.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
A. S. Tamm, O. Lagerquist, A. L. Ley, and D. F. Collins
Chronotype Influences Diurnal Variations in the Excitability of the Human Motor Cortex and the Ability to Generate Torque during a Maximum Voluntary Contraction
J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 2009; 24(3): 211 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Damm and J. McIntyre
Physiological Basis of Limb-Impedance Modulation During Free and Constrained Movements
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2577 - 2588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Verstynen, T. Konkle, and R. B. Ivry
Two Types of TMS-Induced Movement Variability After Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1018 - 1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.