JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 17, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00685.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/3638    most recent
00685.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, C. D
Right arrow Articles by Mattingley, J. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, C. D
Right arrow Articles by Mattingley, J. B
Submitted on June 21, 2007
Accepted on October 13, 2007

Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex

Christopher D Chambers1*, Mark A Bellgrove2, Ian C Gould2, Therese English2, Hugh Garavan3, Elizabeth McNaught2, Marc Kamke2, and Jason B Mattingley2

1 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, United Kingdom
2 Queensland Brain Institute & School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
3 Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chris.chambers{at}ucl.ac.uk.

Intelligent behaviour depends on the ability to suppress inappropriate actions and resolve interference between competing responses. Recent clinical and neuroimaging evidence has demonstrated the involvement of prefrontal, parietal and premotor areas during behaviours that emphasise conflict and inhibition. It remains unclear, however, whether discrete sub-regions within this network are crucial for overseeing more specific inhibitory demands. Here we probed the functional specialisation of human prefrontal cortex by combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with integrated behavioural measures of response inhibition (stop-signal task) and response competition (flanker task). Participants undertook a combined stop-signal/flanker task following rTMS of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) or dorsal premotor cortex (dPM) in each hemisphere. Stimulation of the right IFG impaired stop-signal inhibition under conditions of heightened response competition, but did not influence the ability to suppress a competing response. In contrast, stimulation of the right dPM facilitated execution but had no effect on inhibition. Neither of these results was observed during rTMS of corresponding left-hemisphere regions. Overall, our findings are consistent with existing evidence that the right IFG is crucial for inhibitory control. The observed double-dissociation of neurodisruptive effects between the right IFG and right dPM further implies that response inhibition and execution rely on distinct neural processes, despite activating a common cortical network.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.