JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 29, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00687.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/1/259    most recent
00687.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knyazeva, M. G
Right arrow Articles by Maeder, P. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knyazeva, M. G
Right arrow Articles by Maeder, P. P
Submitted on June 30, 2005
Accepted on March 27, 2006

Interhemispheric integration at different spatial scales: The evidence from EEG coherence and fMRI

Maria G Knyazeva1*, Eleonora Fornari2, Reto A Meuli2, and Philippe P Maeder2

1 Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
2 Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: maria.knyazeva{at}chuv.ch.

The early visual system processes different spatial frequencies (SF) separately. To examine where in the brain the scale-specific information is integrated, we mapped the neural assemblies engaged in interhemispheric coupling with EEG coherence and BOLD. During similar EEG and fMRI experiments, our subjects viewed centrally presented bilateral gratings of different SF (0.25-8.0 cpd), which either obeyed Gestalt grouping rules (iso-oriented, IG) or violated them (orthogonally-oriented, OG). The IG stimuli (0.5-4.0 cpd) synchronized EEG at discrete beta frequencies (beta1, beta2) and increased BOLD (0.5 and 2.0 cpd tested) in ventral (around collateral sulcus) and dorsal (parieto-occipital fissure) regions compared to OG. At both SF, the beta1 coherence correlated with the ventral activations, whereas the beta2 coherence correlated with the dorsal ones. Thus, distributed neural substrates mediated interhemispheric integration at single SF. The relative impact of the ventral vs. dorsal networks was modulated by the SF of the stimulus.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.