JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 16, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.00708.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/1077    most recent
00708.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gai, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carney, L. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gai, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carney, L. H
Submitted on June 26, 2007
Accepted on January 15, 2008

Influence of Inhibitory Inputs on Rate and Timing of Responses in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus

Yan Gai1 and Laurel H Carney2*

1 Institute for Sensory Research, 621 Skytop Rd., Syracuse, New York, 13244-0290, United States; Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, United States
2 Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University; Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: laurel_carney{at}urmc.rochester.edu.

Anatomical and physiological studies have shown that anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) neurons receive glycinergic and GABAergic inhibitory inputs. In this study, changes in the temporal responses of AVCN neurons to pure tones and complex sounds after blocking inhibition were analyzed. Blocking inhibition influenced the temporal responses of each type of AVCN neuron. Choppers showed more chopping peaks and shortened chopping cycles after blocking inhibition. Sustained and slowly adapting choppers showed increased regularity throughout the response duration after blocking inhibition, whereas most transient choppers showed increased regularity in the early part of the response. Diverse changes in temporal response patterns were observed in neurons with primary-like and unusual responses, with several neurons showing a large decrease in the first-spike latency after blocking inhibition. This result disagreed with previous findings that onset responses are less affected than sustained responses by manipulating inhibition. Although blocking inhibition had a larger effect on spontaneous activity than on tone-evoked activity, the change in spontaneous activity was less significant because of larger variability. In addition, for relatively high-level masker noises, blocking inhibition had similar effects on responses to noise-alone and noise-plus-tone stimuli, in contrast with previous studies with low-level background noise. In general, inhibition had an enhancing effect on temporal contrast only for responses to amplitude-modulated tones, for which envelope synchrony was enhanced. Results of this study contribute new information about the characteristics, functional roles, and possible sources of inhibitory inputs received by AVCN neurons.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Milenkovic, I. Rinke, M. Witte, B. Dietz, and R. Rubsamen
P2 Receptor-Mediated Signaling in Spherical Bushy Cells of the Mammalian Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1821 - 1833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Pawson, L. T. Prestia, G. K. Mahoney, B. Guclu, P. J. Cox, and A. K. Pack
GABAergic/Glutamatergic-Glial/Neuronal Interaction Contributes to Rapid Adaptation in Pacinian Corpuscles
J. Neurosci., March 4, 2009; 29(9): 2695 - 2705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.