JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (August 11, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.00712.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/1/210    most recent
00712.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harms, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Melcher, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harms, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Melcher, J. R.
Submitted on July 12, 2004
Accepted on July 30, 2004

Short-term sound temporal envelope characteristics determine multisecond time-patterns of activity in human auditory cortex as shown by FMRI

Michael P. Harms*, John J. Guinan, Jr., Irina S. Sigalovsky, and Jennifer R. Melcher

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: michael.p.harms{at}pfizer.com.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of human auditory cortex has demonstrated a striking range of temporal waveshapes in responses to sound. Prolonged (30 s) low-rate (2/s) noise burst trains elicit "sustained" responses whereas high-rate (35/s) trains elicit "phasic" responses with peaks just after train onset and offset. As a step toward understanding the significance of these responses for auditory processing, the present fMRI study sought to resolve exactly which features of sound determine cortical response waveshape. The results indicate that sound temporal envelope characteristics, but not sound level or bandwidth, strongly influence response waveshapes, and hence the underlying time-patterns of neural activity. The results show that sensitivity to sound temporal envelope holds in both primary and non-primary cortical areas, but non-primary areas show more pronounced phasic responses for some types of stimuli (higher rate trains, continuous noise), indicating more prominent neural activity at sound onset and offset. It has been hypothesized that the neural activity underlying the onset and offset peaks reflects the beginning and end of auditory perceptual events. The present data support this idea because sound temporal envelope, the sound characteristic that most strongly influences whether fMRI responses are phasic, also strongly influences whether successive stimuli (e.g., the bursts of a train) are perceptually grouped into a single auditory event. Thus, fMRI waveshape may provide a window onto neural activity patterns that reflect the segmentation of our auditory environment into distinct, meaningful events.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Qin, S. Chimoto, M. Sakai, J. Wang, and Y. Sato
Comparison Between Offset and Onset Responses of Primary Auditory Cortex ON-OFF Neurons in Awake Cats
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3421 - 3431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. C. Wilson, J. R. Melcher, C. Micheyl, A. Gutschalk, and A. J. Oxenham
Cortical fMRI Activation to Sequences of Tones Alternating in Frequency: Relationship to Perceived Rate and Streaming
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2230 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. L. Jamison, K. E. Watkins, D. V. M. Bishop, and P. M. Matthews
Hemispheric Specialization for Processing Auditory Nonspeech Stimuli
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2006; 16(9): 1266 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.