JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 12, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00714.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/747    most recent
00714.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tabata, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kawano, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tabata, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kawano, K.
Submitted on June 27, 2007
Accepted on December 7, 2007

Trial-by-trial updating of the gain in preparation for smooth pursuit eye movement based on past experience in humans

Hiromitsu Tabata1*, Kenichiro Miura1, and Kenji Kawano1

1 Integrative Brain Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: htabata{at}brain.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

To understand how the central nervous system uses past experiences to generate movements that accommodate minute-by-minute environmental changes, we studied the trial-by-trial updating of the gain for initiating smooth pursuit eye movements and how this relates to the history of previous trials. Ocular responses in humans elicited by a small perturbing motion presented 300 ms after appearance of a target were used as a measure of the gain of visuomotor transmission. After the perturbation, the target was either moved horizontally (pursuit trial) or remained in a stationary position (fixation trial). The trial sequence included pursuit and fixation randomly. The amplitude of the response to the perturbation was modulated in a trial-by-trial manner based on the immediately preceding trial, with preceding fixation and pursuit trials decreasing and increasing the gain, respectively. The effect of the previous trial was larger with shorter inter-trial intervals, but did not diminish for at least 2000 ms. A time series analysis showed that the response amplitude was significantly correlated with the past few trials, with dynamics that could be approximated by a first-order linear system. The results suggest that the central nervous system integrates recent experiences to set the gain in preparation for upcoming tracking movements in a changing environment.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.