JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 14, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00720.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/843    most recent
00720.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, T.
Right arrow Articles by Pai, Y.-C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, T.
Right arrow Articles by Pai, Y.-C. C.
Submitted on June 27, 2007
Accepted on November 10, 2007

CAN OBSERVATIONAL TRAINING SUBSTITUTE MOTOR TRAINING IN PREVENTING BACKWARD BALANCE LOSS FOLLOWING AN UNEXPECTED SLIP DURING WALKING?

Tanvi Bhatt1 and Yi-Chung Clive Pai1*

1 Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cpai{at}uic.edu.

A person's awareness of potential slippery walking conditions induces a cautious gait pattern. The purposes of this study were to determine whether neuromechanical changes associated with such cognitive conditioning are sufficient to alter the outcome of a slip and whether the effects of such conditioning are comparable to those of motor training. Prior to their own first slip exposure, 18 young subjects watched videos and slides demonstrating where and how the slip would occur and how people adapted to repeated-slip exposure (OBSERVE). The outcomes of the first slip exposure experienced by another 16 subjects who did not receive any such information were used as controls (NAIVE). The latter subjects subsequently experienced an additional 23 slips and thus served in a dual-role as the motor training group (MOTOR). Gait stability as measured against backward loss of balance (BLOB) was obtained for pre- and post-slip instances. A protective step landing posterior to the slipping-limb identified each BLOB outcome. The OBSERVE group had a greater post-slip stability and lower slip displacement and velocity than the NAIVE group. However, such effects were insufficient to prevent balance loss (100% BLOB). The MOTOR group showed significantly better performance on the last training slip (0% BLOB) than did the OBSERVE group. The results indicated that updating the cognitive centers of the CNS with awareness and perceptual knowledge through observational training can yield tangible benefits. Nonetheless, observation could not replace the task-specific motor training that adaptively updated the internal representations of stability limits for prevention of BLOB







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.