JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 6, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.00749.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/2/813    most recent
00749.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoeckel, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzler, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoeckel, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzler, A.
Submitted on July 23, 2004
Accepted on September 29, 2004

Shrinkage of somatosensory hand area in subjects with upper extremity dysmelia revealed by magnetoencephalography

M. C. Stoeckel*, Bettina Pollok, Otto W. Witte, Rudiger J. Seitz, and Alfons Schnitzler

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cornelia.stoeckel{at}uni-duesseldorf.de.

The effect of peripheral lesions on cerebral somatosensory representations is well studied for experimentally induced amputations and deafferentations acquired later in life. However, few studies have investigated the brain's capacity for plastic changes in congenital malformations. We studied somatosensory evoked fields to electrical stimulation of the bordering fingers in 10 subjects with upper extremity dysmelia in comparison to 10 control subjects using a 122-channal whole-head magnetometer. The number of developed fingers varied between two and four in the affected subjects. We localized finger representations in the primary somatosensory cortex and calculated Euclidian distances to estimate the size of the somatosensory hand area. Euclidian distances were significantly smaller in dysmelic subjects (5.7 mm) than in control subjects (11.6 mm) and were related to the number of the developed fingers on the contralateral hand. In contrast, individual finger representations were not found to be reduced. We suggest that the shrinkage of the somatosensory hand area might be related to the congenital nature of the malformation, to the smaller anatomical hand size in the affected subjects and/or to use-dependent effects due to impaired hand function.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.