JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol (September 28, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00762.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/1/301    most recent
00762.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tobler, P. N.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tobler, P. N.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, W.
Submitted on July 19, 2005
Accepted on September 21, 2005

HUMAN NEURAL LEARNING DEPENDS ON REWARD PREDICTION ERRORS IN THE BLOCKING PARADIGM

Philippe N. Tobler1*, John P. O'Doherty1, Ray J. Dolan1, and Wolfram Schultz1

1 Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pnt21{at}cam.ac.uk.

Learning occurs when an outcome deviates from expectation (prediction error). According to formal learning theory the defining paradigm demonstrating the role of prediction errors in learning is the blocking test. Here, a novel stimulus is blocked from learning when it is associated with a fully predicted outcome, presumably because the occurrence of the outcome fails to produce a prediction error. We investigated the role of prediction errors in human reward-directed learning using a blocking paradigm, and measured brain activation with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants showed blocking of behavioral learning with juice rewards as predicted by learning theory. The medial orbitofrontal cortex and the ventral putamen showed significantly lower responses to blocked, compared to non-blocked, reward-predicting stimuli. In reward-predicting control situations, deactivations in orbitofrontal cortex and ventral putamen occurred at the time of unpredicted reward omissions. Responses in discrete parts of orbitofrontal cortex correlated with the degree of behavioral learning during, and after, the learning phase. These data suggest that learning in primary reward structures in the human brain correlates with prediction errors in a manner that complies with principles of formal learning theory.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BrainHome page
P. Kumar, G. Waiter, T. Ahearn, M. Milders, I. Reid, and J. D. Steele
Abnormal temporal difference reward-learning signals in major depression
Brain, August 1, 2008; 131(8): 2084 - 2093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
T. A. Hare, J. O'Doherty, C. F. Camerer, W. Schultz, and A. Rangel
Dissociating the Role of the Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Striatum in the Computation of Goal Values and Prediction Errors
J. Neurosci., May 28, 2008; 28(22): 5623 - 5630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Bray and J. O'Doherty
Neural Coding of Reward-Prediction Error Signals During Classical Conditioning With Attractive Faces
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3036 - 3045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Learn. Mem.Home page
G. P. McNally and R. F. Westbrook
Predicting danger: The nature, consequences, and neural mechanisms of predictive fear learning.
Learn. Mem., May 1, 2006; 13(3): 245 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
M. D. Iordanova, G. P. McNally, and R. F. Westbrook
Opioid Receptors in the Nucleus Accumbens Regulate Attentional Learning in the Blocking Paradigm
J. Neurosci., April 12, 2006; 26(15): 4036 - 4045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.