JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 13, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.00767.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/3/1235    most recent
00767.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Churchland, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lisberger, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Churchland, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lisberger, S. G.
Submitted on July 28, 2004
Accepted on October 5, 2004

Comparison of the spatial limits on direction selectivity in visual areas MT and V1

Mark M. Churchland1*, Nicholas J. Priebe1, and Stephen G. Lisberger2

1 Neuroscience Graduate Program and Department of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Physiology, and W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: church{at}stanford.edu.

We recorded responses to apparent motion from directionally selective neurons in V1 of anaesthetized monkeys and MT of awake monkeys. Apparent motion consisted of multiple stationary stimulus flashes presented in sequence, characterized by their temporal separation ({Delta}t) and spatial separation ({Delta}x). Stimuli were 8° square patterns of 100% correlated random dots that moved at apparent speeds of 16 or 32°/s. For both V1 and MT, the difference between the response to the preferred and null directions declined with increasing flash separation. For each neuron, we estimated the maximum flash separation for which directionally selective responses were observed. For the range of speeds we used, {Delta}x provided a better description of the limitation on directional responses than did {Delta}t. When comparing MT and V1 neurons of similar preferred speed, there was no difference in the maximum {Delta}x between our samples from the two areas. In both V1 and MT, the great majority of neurons had maximal values of {Delta}x in the 0.25-1° range. Mean values were almost identical between the two areas. For most neurons, larger flash separations led to both weaker responses to the preferred direction and increased responses to the opposite direction. The former mechanism was slightly more dominant in MT, and the latter slightly more dominant in V1. We conclude that V1 and MT neurons lose direction selectivity for similar values of {Delta}x, supporting the hypothesis that basic direction selectivity in MT is inherited from V1, at least over the range of stimulus speeds represented by both areas.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. W. Roe, A. J. Parker, R. T. Born, and G. C. DeAngelis
Disparity Channels in Early Vision
J. Neurosci., October 31, 2007; 27(44): 11820 - 11831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. K. Churchland, X. Huang, and S. G. Lisberger
Responses of Neurons in the Medial Superior Temporal Visual Area to Apparent Motion Stimuli in Macaque Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 272 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. C. Pack, B. R. Conway, R. T. Born, and M. S. Livingstone
Spatiotemporal Structure of Nonlinear Subunits in Macaque Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., January 18, 2006; 26(3): 893 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.