JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 9, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.00778.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/1152    most recent
00778.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rupp, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dau, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rupp, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dau, T.
Submitted on July 10, 2007
Accepted on January 6, 2008

Representation of auditory filter phase characteristics in the cortex of human listeners

Andre Rupp1*, Norman Sieroka2, Alexander Gutschalk3, and Torsten Dau4

1 Section of Biomagnetism, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2 Chair for Philosophy, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3 Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
4 Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Oersted DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andre.rupp{at}uni-heidelberg.de.

Harmonic tone complexes with component phases, adjusted using a variant of a method proposed by Schroeder (IEEE Trans Inf Theory 16: 85-89, 1970), can produce pure-tone masked thresholds differing by more than 20 dB. This phenomenon has been qualitatively explained by the phase characteristics of the auditory filters on the basilar membrane which differently affect the flat envelopes of the Schroeder-phase maskers. We examined the influence of auditory-filter phase characteristics on the neural representation in the auditory cortex by investigating cortical auditory evoked fields (AEF). We found that the P1m component exhibited larger amplitudes when a long-duration tone was presented in a repeating linearly downward sweeping (Schroeder positive, or m+) masker than in a repeating linearly upward sweeping (Schroeder negative, or m-) masker. We also examined the neural representation of short-duration tone pulses presented at different temporal positions within a single period of three maskers differing in their component phases (m+, m-, and sine phase m0). The P1m amplitude varied with the position of the tone pulse in the masker and depended strongly on the masker waveform. The neuromagnetic results in all cases were consistent with the perceptual data obtained with the same stimuli and with results from simulations of neural activity at the output of cochlear preprocessing. These findings demonstrate that phase effects in peripheral auditory processing are accurately reflected up to the level of the auditory cortex.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.