|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Visual Neuroscience, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.sumner{at}imperial.ac.uk.
Visual stimuli can inhibit as well as activate motor mechanisms. In one well known example, the latency of saccadic eye movements is prolonged in the presence of a fixation stimulus, relative to the case in which the fixation stimulus disappears before the target appears. This automatic sensory-motor effect, known as the gap effect or fixation offset effect, has been associated with inhibitory connections within the superior colliculus (SC). Visual information is provided to the SC and other oculomotor areas, such as the frontal eye fields (FEF), mainly by the magnocellular geniculostriate pathway, and also by the retinotectal pathway. We tested whether signals in these pathways are necessary to create fixation-related inhibition, by employing stimuli invisible to them. We found that such stimuli, visible only to short wave sensitive cones (S cones), do produce fixation-related inhibition (including when warning effects were equated). We also demonstrate that this fixation-related inhibition cannot be explained by residual activation of luminance pathways, and must be caused by a route separate from that of luminance fixation signals. Thus there are at least two routes that cause fixation-related inhibition, and direct sensory input to the SC or FEF via the magnocellular or retinotectal pathways is not required. We discuss the implications that there may be both cortical and collicular mechanisms.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bompas, T. Sterling, R. D. Rafal, and P. Sumner Naso-Temporal Asymmetry for Signals Invisible to the Retinotectal Pathway J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 412 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |