JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (January 15, 2003). doi:10.1152/jn.00820.2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/5/2655    most recent
00820.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haynes, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Heinze, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haynes, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Heinze, H. J.
Submitted on September 17, 2002
Accepted on January 1, 2003

Neuromagnetic Correlates of Perceived Contrast in Primary Visual Cortex

John D. Haynes1*, Gerhard Roth2, Michael A. Stadler3, and Hans J. Heinze4

1 Department of Neurology II, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
2 Brain Research Institute, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
3 Institute for Psychology and Cognition Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
4 Department of Neurology II, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: haynes{at}pion.ac.uk.

When a target grating is flashed into a larger, surrounding grating, its contrast is perceived to be lower when both gratings are oriented collinearly rather than orthogonally. This effect can be used to dissociate the perceived contrast from the physical contrast of a target grating. We recorded the transient electric potentials and magnetic fields evoked by flashed target gratings and compared them with psychophysical judgements of perceived contrast. Both early (100 ms) and late (150 ms) transients were reduced in amplitude when targets were flashed into a collinear rather than orthogonal surround, thus paralleling the reduction in perceived contrast. Although targets in orthogonal backgrounds required 40% lower physical contrast to match the perceived contrast of collinear targets the amplitudes of electrophysiological transients of matching stimuli were almost identical. Thus, the responses correlated better with perceived than with physical target contrast. This holds especially for the late transient response. Source localisation indicated that the transients in question may originate in primary visual cortex. Our results therefore identify the activity of primary visual cortex as one possible neural correlate of perceived contrast.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
J. H. Yoon, A. S. Rokem, M. A. Silver, M. J. Minzenberg, S. Ursu, J. D. Ragland, and C. S. Carter
Diminished Orientation-Specific Surround Suppression of Visual Processing in Schizophrenia
Schizophr Bull, November 1, 2009; 35(6): 1078 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. S. Weil, J. M. Kilner, J. D. Haynes, and G. Rees
Neural correlates of perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma in humans
PNAS, March 20, 2007; 104(12): 5211 - 5216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-D. Haynes, R. B. Lotto, and G. Rees
Responses of human visual cortex to uniform surfaces
PNAS, March 23, 2004; 101(12): 4286 - 4291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.