JN Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 10, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00838.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/3423    most recent
00838.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molnar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Werblin, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molnar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Werblin, F. S.
Submitted on July 26, 2007
Accepted on October 5, 2007

Inhibitory Feedback Shapes Bipolar Cell Responses in the Rabbit Retina

Alyosha Molnar1 and Frank S. Werblin2*

1 EECS, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
2 Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: werblin{at}berkeley.edu.

Retinal bipolar cells can be divided into ON and OFF types, based upon the polarity of their response to light. Bipolar activity is further shaped by inhibitory feedback, characterized here by the events that occur immediately following the onset of a light step: 1) In most OFF bipolar cells, excitatory current decreased while inhibitory current increased. These currents reinforced each other, enhancing the light response. 2) In about half of the ON cone bipolar cells, the excitatory current increased while inhibitory current decreased, also reinforcing the light response. Both of these reinforcing interactions were mediated by glycinergic inhibition. 3) In the remaining ON cone bipolar cells, excitation and inhibition both increased, but inhibition was delayed, so that these cells responded transiently. 4) Finally, in rod bipolar cells, excitation and inhibition both increased, so that inhibition suppressed excitation, reducing the light response at all time scales. The suppressive inhibition seen in ON cone and rod bipolar cells was mediated by GABA. Thus, morphologically diverse bipolar cells receive only four main types of inhibitory input, and the majority of inputs, conventionally described as inhibitory, actually serve to enhance excitation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Hou, L. Duan, and M. M. Slaughter
Synaptic inhibition by glycine acting at a metabotropic receptor in tiger salamander retina
J. Physiol., June 15, 2008; 586(12): 2913 - 2926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. B. Manookin, D. L. Beaudoin, Z. R. Ernst, L. J. Flagel, and J. B. Demb
Disinhibition Combines with Excitation to Extend the Operating Range of the OFF Visual Pathway in Daylight
J. Neurosci., April 16, 2008; 28(16): 4136 - 4150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.