JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (September 27, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00839.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/6/3362    most recent
00839.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kawasaki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kawasaki, M.
Submitted on August 10, 2006
Accepted on September 25, 2006

Stimulus selectivity is enhanced by voltage-dependent conductances in combination-sensitive neurons

Bruce Allen Carlson1* and Masashi Kawasaki1

1 Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bc6s{at}virginia.edu.

Central sensory neurons often respond selectively to particular combinations of stimulus attributes, but we know little about the underlying cellular mechanisms. The weakly electric fish Gymnarchus discriminates the sign of the frequency difference, Df, between a neighbor's electric organ discharge (EOD) and its own EOD by comparing temporal patterns of amplitude modulation (AM) and phase modulation (PM). Sign-selective neurons in the midbrain respond preferentially to either positive frequency differences (Df>0-selective) or negative frequency differences (Df<0-selective). To study the mechanisms of combination sensitivity, we made whole-cell intracellular recordings from sign-selective midbrain neurons in vivo and recorded postsynaptic potential (PSP) responses to AM, PM, Df>0, and Df<0. Responses to AM and PM consisted of alternating excitatory and inhibitory PSPs. These alternating responses were in phase for the preferred sign of Df, and offset for the nonpreferred sign of Df. Therefore, a certain degree of sign-selectivity was predicted by a linear sum of the responses to AM and PM. Responses to the nonpreferred sign of Df, but not the preferred sign of Df, were substantially weaker than linear predictions, causing a significant increase in the actual degree of sign-selectivity. By using various levels of current clamp and comparing our results to simple models of synaptic integration, we demonstrate that this decreased response to the nonpreferred sign of Df is caused by a reduction in voltage-dependent excitatory conductances. This finding reveals that nonlinear decoders, in the form of voltage-dependent conductances, can enhance the selectivity of single neurons for particular combinations of stimulus attributes.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.