JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (April 26, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00851.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3887    most recent
00851.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grandy, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Westwood, D. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grandy, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Westwood, D. A
Submitted on August 12, 2005
Accepted on March 19, 2006

Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion

Mathew S Grandy1 and David A Westwood1*

1 School of Health Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david.westwood{at}dal.ca.

The perceptual size-weight illusion (SWI) occurs when two different sized objects with equal mass are lifted in sequence: the smaller object is consistently reported to feel heavier than the larger object even after repeated lifting attempts. Here we explored the relationship between sensorimotor and perceptual responses to a SWI in which the smaller of the two target objects in fact weighed slightly less (2.7 N) than the larger object (3.2 N). For twenty consecutive lifts, participants consistently reported that the small-light object felt heavier than the large-heavy object; however, concurrently measured lifting dynamics showed exactly the opposite pattern: peak grip force, peak grip force rate, peak load force and peak load force rate were all significantly greater for the large-heavy object versus the small-light object. The difference in peak load rate between the two objects was greatest for the initial lift but decreased significantly beyond that point, suggesting that the sensorimotor system used sensory feedback to correct for initial over- and under-estimations of object mass. Despite these adjustments to lifting dynamics over the early trials, the difference between the judged heaviness of the two objects did not change. The findings clearly demonstrate that the sensorimotor and perceptual systems utilize distinctly different mechanisms for determining object mass.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Rabe, B. Brandauer, Y. Li, E. R. Gizewski, D. Timmann, and J. Hermsdorfer
Size-Weight Illusion, Anticipation, and Adaptation of Fingertip Forces in Patients With Cerebellar Degeneration
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 569 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.