JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 10, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00865.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/3284    most recent
00865.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Rice, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Rice, A. D.
Submitted on August 3, 2007
Accepted on October 8, 2007

SLEEP/WAKE FIRING PATTERNS OF HUMAN GENIOGLOSSUS MOTOR UNITS

E. Fiona Bailey1*, Keith W Fridel2, and Amber D. Rice1

1 Physiology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States
2 Psychology, The University of Arizona, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ebailey{at}u.arizona.edu.

Although studies of the principal tongue protrudor muscle, genioglossus (GG) suggest that whole muscle GG electromyographic (EMG) activities are preserved in NREM sleep, it is unclear what influence sleep exerts on individual GG motor unit (MU) activities. We characterized the firing patterns of human GG MUs in wakefulness and NREM sleep with the aim of determining a) whether the range of MU discharge patterns evident in wakefulness is preserved in sleep and b) what effect the removal of the wakefulness input has on the respiratory modulation of MU activities. Microelectrodes inserted into the extrinsic tongue protrudor muscle, the genioglossus (GG), were used to follow the discharge of single MUs. We categorized MU activities on the basis of the temporal relationship between the spike train and the respiration cycle and quantified the respiratory modulation of each MU using the eta index (Netick & Orem, 1981), in wakefulness and sleep. The majority of MUs exhibited subtle increases or decreases in respiratory modulation but were otherwise unaffected by NREM sleep. In contrast, 30% of MUs exhibited marked sleep-associated changes in discharge frequency and respiratory modulation. We suggest that GG MUs should not be considered exclusively tonic or phasic rather, discharge pattern appears to be a flexible feature of GG activities in healthy young adults. Whether flexibility is important in the response to changes in the chemical and/or mechanical environment and whether it is preserved in the aged or in individuals with OSA are critical questions for future research.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.