JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (May 3, 2006). doi:10.1152/jn.00868.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/1772    most recent
00868.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mileusnic, M. P
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mileusnic, M. P
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, G. E.
Submitted on August 17, 2005
Accepted on March 1, 2006

Mathematical models of proprioceptors: I. Control and transduction in the muscle spindle

Milana P Mileusnic1, Ian E Brown1, Ning Lan1, and Gerald E. Loeb1*

1 Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gloeb{at}usc.edu.

We have constructed a physiologically realistic model of a lower-limb, mammalian muscle spindle that is composed of mathematical elements closely related to the anatomical components found in the biological spindle. The spindle model incorporates three nonlinear intrafusal fiber models (bag1, bag2 and chain) that contribute variously to action potential generation of primary and secondary afferents. A single set of model parameters was optimized on a number of data sets collected from feline soleus muscle, accounting accurately for afferent activity during a variety of ramp, triangular and sinusoidal stretches. We also incorporated the different temporal properties of fusimotor activation as observed in the twitch-like chain fibers versus the tonic-like bag fibers. The model captures the spindle's behavior both in the absence of fusimotor stimulation and during activation of static or dynamic fusimotor efferents. In the case of simultaneous static and dynamic fusimotor efferent stimulation, we demonstrated the importance of including the experimentally observed effect of partial occlusion. The model was validated against data that originated from the cat's medial gastrocnemius muscle and was different from the data used for the parameter determination purposes. The validation record included recently published experiments in which fusimotor efferent and spindle afferent activities were recorded simultaneously during decerebrate locomotion in the cat. This model will be useful in understanding the role of the muscle spindle and its fusimotor control during both natural and pathological motor behavior.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Dimitriou and B. B. Edin
Discharges in human muscle spindle afferents during a key-pressing task
J. Physiol., November 15, 2008; 586(22): 5455 - 5470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. Prochazka and S. Yakovenko
Predictive and reactive tuning of the locomotor CPG
Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 47(4): 474 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. P. Mileusnic and G. E. Loeb
Mathematical Models of Proprioceptors. II. Structure and Function of the Golgi Tendon Organ
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1789 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.