| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Neurobiology & Anatomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tania{at}cvs.rochester.edu.
We recorded the activity of MT neurons in two monkeys while they compared the directions of motion in two sequentially presented random-dot stimuli, sample and test, and reported them as the same or different by pressing one of two buttons. We found that MT neurons were active not only in response to the sample and test stimuli but also during the 1500 ms delay separating them. Most neurons showed a characteristic pattern of activity consisting of a small burst of firing early in the delay, followed by a period of suppression and a subsequent increase in firing rate immediately preceding the presentation of the test stimulus. In a third of the neurons, the activity early in the delay not only reflected the direction of the sample stimulus, but was also related to the range of local directions it contained. During the middle of the delay the majority of neurons were suppressed, consistent with a gating mechanism that could be used to ignore task irrelevant stimuli. Late in the delay, most neurons showed an increase in response, probably in anticipation of the upcoming test. Throughout most of the delay there was a directional signal in the population of MT neurons, manifested by higher firing rates following the sample moving in the anti-preferred direction. While some of these effects may be related to sensory adaptation, others are more likely to represent a more active task-related process. These results support the hypothesis that MT neurons actively participate in the successful execution of all aspects of the task requiring processing and remembering visual motion.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Mojzisch and K. Krug Cells, circuits, and choices: Social influences on perceptual decision making Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, December 1, 2008; 8(4): 498 - 508. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. WENGER, A. M. COPELAND, J. L. BITTNER, and R. D. THOMAS Evidence for criterion shifts in visual perceptual learning: Data and implications Percept Psychophys, October 1, 2008; 70(7): 1248 - 1273. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.R. Burke and G.R. Barnes Brain and Behavior: A Task-Dependent Eye Movement Study Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 126 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ardid, X.-J. Wang, and A. Compte An Integrated Microcircuit Model of Attentional Processing in the Neocortex J. Neurosci., August 8, 2007; 27(32): 8486 - 8495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. R. Lehky and K. Tanaka Enhancement of Object Representations in Primate Perirhinal Cortex During a Visual Working-Memory Task J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1298 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Zaksas and T. Pasternak Directional Signals in the Prefrontal Cortex and in Area MT during a Working Memory for Visual Motion Task. J. Neurosci., November 8, 2006; 26(45): 11726 - 11742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Zaksas and T. Pasternak Area MT Neurons Respond to Visual Motion Distant From Their Receptive Fields J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4156 - 4167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Constantinidis and X.-J. Wang A Neural Circuit Basis for Spatial Working Memory Neuroscientist, December 1, 2004; 10(6): 553 - 565. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Bennett and G. R. Barnes Predictive Smooth Ocular Pursuit During the Transient Disappearance of a Visual Target J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 578 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
