JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 19, 2005). doi:10.1152/jn.00877.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/3/1771    most recent
00877.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bensmaia, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bensmaia, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. O.
Submitted on August 19, 2005
Accepted on October 17, 2005

SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings

Sliman J. Bensmaia1*, James C. Craig1, Takashi Yoshioka1, and Kenneth O. Johnson1

1 Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sliman{at}jhu.edu.

SA1 and RA afferent fibers differ both in their ability to convey information about the fine spatial structure of tactile stimuli and in their frequency sensitivity profiles. In the present study, we investigated the extent to which the spatial resolution of the signal conveyed by SA1 and RA fibers depends upon the temporal properties of the stimulus. To that end, we recorded the responses evoked in SA1 and RA fibers of macaques by static and vibrating gratings that varied in spatial period, vibratory frequency, and amplitude. Gratings were oriented either parallel to the long axis of the finger (vertical) or perpendicular to it (horizontal). We examined the degree to which afferent responses were dependent upon the spatial period, vibratory frequency, amplitude, and orientation of the gratings. We found that: 1. The spatial modulation of the afferent responses increased as the spatial period of the gratings increased; 2. The spatial modulation was the same for static and vibrating gratings, despite large differences in evoked spike rates; 3. The spatial modulation in SA1 responses was independent of stimulus amplitude over the range of amplitudes tested whereas RA modulation decreased slightly as the stimulus amplitude increased; 4. Vertical gratings evoked stronger and more highly modulated responses than horizontal gratings; 5. The modulation in SA1 responses was higher than that in RA responses at all frequencies and amplitudes. The behavioral consequences of these neurophysiological findings are examined in a companion paper.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. J. Bensmaia, P. V. Denchev, J. F. Dammann III, J. C. Craig, and S. S. Hsiao
The Representation of Stimulus Orientation in the Early Stages of Somatosensory Processing
J. Neurosci., January 16, 2008; 28(3): 776 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. P. Sripati, S. J. Bensmaia, and K. O. Johnson
A Continuum Mechanical Model of Mechanoreceptive Afferent Responses to Indented Spatial Patterns
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3852 - 3864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.