JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 12, 2008). doi:10.1152/jn.00878.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/1/306    most recent
00878.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlsen, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Franks, I. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carlsen, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Franks, I. M
Submitted on August 7, 2007
Accepted on November 3, 2008

Differential effects of startle on reaction time for finger and arm movements

Anthony N. Carlsen1*, Romeo Chua2, John Timothy Inglis3, David J Sanderson4, and Ian M Franks3

1 School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
2 Vancouver, Canada; School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
3 Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
4 School of HUman Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: carlsen{at}interchange.ubc.ca.

Recent studies employing a reaction time (RT) task have reported that a preprogrammed response could be triggered directly by a startling acoustic stimulus (115-124 dB) presented along with the usual "go" signal. It has been suggested that details of the upcoming response could be stored subcortically and are accessible by the startle volley, directly eliciting the correct movement. However, certain muscles (e.g. intrinsic hand) are heavily dependent on cortico-motoneuronal connections, and thus would not be directly subject to the subcortical startle volley in a similar way to muscles whose innervations include extensive reticular connections. In the present study fourteen participants performed 75 trials in each of two tasks within a RT paradigm: an arm extension task, and an index finger abduction task. In 12 trials within each task, the regular "go" stimulus (82 dB) was replaced with a 115 dB startling stimulus. Results showed that in the arm task, the presence of a startle reaction led to significantly shorter latency arm movements compared to the effect of the increased stimulus intensity alone. In contrast, for the finger task, no additional decrease in RT due to startle was observed. Taken together these results suggest that only movements that involve muscles more strongly innervated by subcortical pathways are susceptible to response advancement by startle.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.