JN AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (March 21, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00886.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/5/3684    most recent
00886.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asher, I.
Right arrow Articles by Prut, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asher, I.
Right arrow Articles by Prut, Y.
Submitted on August 19, 2006
Accepted on March 14, 2007

Comparison of direction and object selectivity of local field potentials and single units in macaque posterior parietal cortex during prehension

Itay Asher1*, Eran Stark2, Moshe Abeles3, and Yifat Prut1

1 Department of Physiology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; The Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel
2 Department of Physiology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
3 Department of Physiology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; The Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel; Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar Ilan University, Keren Hayesod, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: itaya{at}ekmd.huji.ac.il.

Recent studies have shown that the local field potential (LFP) can provide a simple method for obtaining an accurate measure of reaching and saccade behaviors. However, it is not clear whether this signal is equally informative with respect to more complex movements. Here we recorded LFPs and single units (SUs) from different areas in the posterior parietal cortex of macaques during a prehension task, and compared LFP selectivity with SU selectivity. We found that parietal LFPs were often selective to target direction or object, and that percentages of selective LFPs were similar to percentages of selective SUs. Nevertheless, SUs were more informative than LFPs in several respects. Preferred directions and objects of LFPs usually deviated from a uniform distribution, unlike preferences of SUs. Furthermore, preferences of LFPs did not reflect preferences of SUs even when the two signals were recorded simultaneously via the same electrode. Additionally, selectivity of movement-evoked LFPs appeared only after movement onset, whereas SUs frequently showed pre-movement selectivity. Spectral analysis revealed a lower signal-to-noise ratio of the LFP signal. Different frequency bands derived from a single LFP site showed inconsistent preferences. Significant relations with target parameters were found for all tested bands of LFP, but effects in the fast (Gamma) band exhibited properties that were consistent with contamination of the LFP by residual spiking activity. Taken together, our results suggest that the LFP provides a simple method for extracting ample movement-related information. However, some of its properties make it less adequate for predicting rapidly-changing movements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. L. Spinks, A. Kraskov, T. Brochier, M. A. Umilta, and R. N. Lemon
Selectivity for Grasp in Local Field Potential and Single Neuron Activity Recorded Simultaneously from M1 and F5 in the Awake Macaque Monkey
J. Neurosci., October 22, 2008; 28(43): 10961 - 10971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.