Submitted on August 10, 2007
Accepted on October 22, 2007
A rose by any other name: Would it smell as sweet?
Jelena Djordjevic1*, Johan N. Lundstrom2, Francis Clement3, Julie A. Boyle2, Sandra Pouliot2, and Marilyn Jones-Gotman2
1 Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
2 Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
3 Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jelena.djordjevic{at}mail.mcgill.ca.
We examined whether presenting an odor with a positive, neutral or negative name would influence how people perceive it. In Experiment 1, 40 participants rated 15 odors for their pleasantness, intensity, and arousal. In Experiment 2, 30 participants passively smelled 10 odors while their skin conductance (SC), heart rate (HR), and sniffing were recorded. We found significant overall effects of odor names on perceived pleasantness, intensity and arousal. Pleasantness showed the most robust effect of odor names: the same odors were perceived as more pleasant when presented with positive than with neutral and negative names, and when presented with neutral than with negative names. In addition, odorants were rated as more intense when presented with negative than with neutral and positive names, and as more arousing when presented with positive than with neutral names. Furthermore, SC and sniff volumes, but not HR, were modified by odor names, and the SC changes could not be accounted for by sniffing changes. Importantly, odor names presented with odorless water did not produce any effect on skin conductance and sniff volumes, ruling out the possibility that the naming-related findings were triggered by an emotional reaction to odor names. Taken together, these experiments show that there is a lot to a name, at least when it comes to olfactory perception.
