JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 14, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00903.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/1/297    most recent
00903.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Islam, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Zelenin, P. V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Islam, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Zelenin, P. V
Submitted on August 13, 2007
Accepted on November 11, 2007

Modifications of locomotor pattern underlying escape behavior in the lamprey

Salma S. Islam1 and Pavel V Zelenin2*

1 Department of Neuroscience, The Nobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
2 The Nobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pavel.zelenin{at}ki.se.

Two forms of undulatory locomotion in the lamprey (a lower vertebrate) have been described earlier: fast forward swimming (FFS) used for long distance migrations, and slow backward swimming (SBS) used for escape from adverse tactile stimuli. In the present study, we describe another form of escape behavior - slow forward swimming (SFS). We characterize the kinematical and electromyographic patterns of SFS and compare them with SBS and FFS. The most striking feature of SFS is non-uniformity of shape and speed of the locomotor waves propagating along the body: close to the site of stimulation, the waves slow down, and the body curvature increases several-fold due to enhanced muscle activity. Lesions of afferents showed that sensory information critical for elicitation of SFS is transmitted through the dorsal roots. In contrast, sensory signals that induce SBS are transmitted through the dorsal roots, lateral line nerves, and trigeminal nerves. Persistence of SFS and SBS after different lesions of the spinal cord suggests that the ascending and descending pathways, necessary for induction of SBS and SFS, are dispersed over the cross-section of the spinal cord. As shown previously, during FFS (but not SBS) the lamprey maintains the dorsal-side-up body orientation due to vestibular postural reflexes. In this study we have found that the orientation control is absent during SFS. The role of the spinal cord and the brainstem in generation of different forms of undulatory locomotion is discussed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.