JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 26, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00906.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/1169    most recent
00906.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cheney, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cheney, P. D.
Submitted on August 13, 2007
Accepted on December 23, 2007

Do Corticomotoneuronal Cells Predict Target Muscle EMG Activity?

Darcy Michelle Griffin1, Heather M Hudson1, Abderraouf Belhaj-Saif2, Brian J. McKiernan3, and Paul D. Cheney1*

1 Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
2 Medecin, The University of Fribourg, Division of Physiology, Fribourg, CH-1700, Switzerland
3 United States; , United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pcheney{at}kumc.edu.

Data from two rhesus macaques was used to investigate the pattern of cortical cell activation during reach-to-grasp movements in relation to the corresponding activation pattern of the cell’s facilitated target muscles. The presence of postspike facilitation (PSpF) in spike-triggered averages (SpTA) of electromyographic (EMG) activity was used to identify cortical neurons with excitatory synaptic linkages with motoneurons. EMG activity from 22-24 muscles of the forelimb was recorded together with the activity of M1 cortical neurons. The extent of covariation was characterized by: 1) identifying the task segment containing the cell and target muscle activity peaks, 2) quantifying the timing and overlap between CM cell and EMG peaks, and 3) applying Pearson correlation analysis to plots of CM cell firing rate versus EMG activity of the cell’s facilitated muscles. At least one firing rate peak, for nearly all (95%) CM cells tested matched a corresponding peak in the EMG activity of the cell’s target muscles. Although some individual CM cells had very strong correlations with target muscles, overall, substantial disparities were common. We also investigated correlations for ensembles of CM cells sharing the same target muscle. The ensemble population activity of even a small number of CM cells influencing the same target muscle produced a relatively good match (r ≥ 0.8) to target muscle EMG activity. Our results provide evidence in support of the notion that corticomotoneuronal output from primary motor cortex encodes movement in a framework of muscle based parameters, specifically, muscle activation patterns as reflected in EMG activity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. S. Smith and E. E. Fetz
Synaptic Linkages Between Corticomotoneuronal Cells Affecting Forelimb Muscles in Behaving Primates
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1040 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Post, R. Bakels, and I. Zijdewind
Inadvertent Contralateral Activity during a Sustained Unilateral Contraction Reflects the Direction of Target Movement
J. Neurosci., May 13, 2009; 29(19): 6353 - 6357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.