JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 20, 2004). doi:10.1152/jn.00912.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/3/1450    most recent
00912.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ego-Stengel, V.
Right arrow Articles by Shulz, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ego-Stengel, V.
Right arrow Articles by Shulz, D. E.
Submitted on September 1, 2004
Accepted on October 14, 2004

Spatiotemporal characteristics of neuronal sensory integration in the barrel cortex of the rat

Valerie Ego-Stengel, Tadeu Mello e Souza, Vincent Jacob, and Daniel E. Shulz*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: shulz{at}iaf.cnrs-gif.fr.

In primary sensory cortices, neuronal responses to a stimulus presented as part of a rapid sequence often differ from responses to an isolated stimulus. It has been reported that sequential stimulation of two whiskers produces facilitatory modulations of barrel cortex neuronal responses. These results are at odds with the well-known suppressive interaction that has been usually described. Herein, we have examined the dependency of response modulation on the spatiotemporal pattern of stimulation by varying the spatial arrangement of the deflected vibrissae, the temporal frequency of stimulation and the time interval between whisker deflections. Extracellular recordings were made from primary somatosensory cortex of anesthetized rats. Two contralateral whiskers were stimulated at 0.5 and 8 Hz, at intervals ranging from 0 to +/-30 ms. Response interactions were assessed during stimulation of the principal and an adjacent whiskers, first from the same row and second from the same arc. When tested at 0.5 Hz, 59 % of single-units showed a statistically significant suppressive interaction, whereas response facilitation was found in only 6 % of cells. In contrast, at 8 Hz, a significant supralinear summation was observed in 19 % of the cells particularly for stimulations along an arc rather than along a row. Multi-unit recordings showed similar results. These observations indicate that most of the interactions in the barrel cortex during two-whisker stimulation are suppressive. However, facilitation can be revealed when stimuli are applied at a physiological frequency, and could be the basis for internal representations of the spatiotemporal pattern of the stimulus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. J. Drew and D. E. Feldman
Representation of Moving Wavefronts of Whisker Deflection in Rat Somatosensory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1566 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. J. Higley and D. Contreras
Frequency Adaptation Modulates Spatial Integration of Sensory Responses in the Rat Whisker System
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3819 - 3824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Celikel and B. Sakmann
Sensory integration across space and in time for decision making in the somatosensory system of rodents
PNAS, January 23, 2007; 104(4): 1395 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Katz, J. E. Heiss, and I. Lampl
Cross-Whisker Adaptation of Neurons in the Rat Barrel Cortex
J. Neurosci., December 20, 2006; 26(51): 13363 - 13372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. M. Rodgers, A. M. Benison, and D. S. Barth
Two-Dimensional Coincidence Detection in the Vibrissa/Barrel Field
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1981 - 1990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Derdikman, C. Yu, S. Haidarliu, K. Bagdasarian, A. Arieli, and E. Ahissar
Layer-Specific Touch-Dependent Facilitation and Depression in the Somatosensory Cortex during Active Whisking.
J. Neurosci., September 13, 2006; 26(37): 9538 - 9547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. F. Civillico and D. Contreras
Integration of Evoked Responses in Supragranular Cortex Studied With Optical Recordings In Vivo
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 336 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. Tutunculer, G. Foffani, B. T. Himes, and K. A. Moxon
Structure of the Excitatory Receptive Fields of Infragranular Forelimb Neurons in the Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex Responding To Touch
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 791 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. M. Benison, T. D. Ard, A. M. Crosby, and D. S. Barth
Temporal Patterns of Field Potentials in Vibrissa/Barrel Cortex Reveal Stimulus Orientation and Shape
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2242 - 2251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the The American Physiological Society.