JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (October 17, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00914.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/3360    most recent
00914.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stauffer, E. A
Right arrow Articles by Holt, J. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stauffer, E. A
Right arrow Articles by Holt, J. R
Submitted on August 15, 2007
Accepted on October 10, 2007

Sensory Transduction and Adaptation in Inner and Outer Hair Cells of the Mouse Auditory System

Eric A Stauffer1 and Jeffrey R Holt1*

1 Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jeffholt{at}virginia.edu.

Auditory function in the mammalian inner ear is optimized by collaboration of two classes of sensory cells known as inner and outer hair cells. Outer hair cells amplify and tune sound stimuli which are transduced and transmitted by inner hair cells. Although they subserve distinct functions, they share a number of common properties. Here we compare the properties of mechanotransduction and adaptation recorded from inner and outer hair cells of the postnatal mouse cochlea. Rapid outer hair bundle deflections of ~0.5 microns evoked average maximal transduction currents of ~325 pA, whereas inner hair bundle deflections of ~0.9 microns were required to evoke average maximal currents of ~310 pA. The similar amplitude was surprising given the difference in the number of stereocilia, 81 for outer hair cells and 48 for inner hair cells, but may be reconciled by the difference in single channel conductance. Step deflections of inner and outer hair bundles evoked adaptation that had two components: a fast component that consisted of ~60% of the response occurred over the first few msec and a slow component that consisted of ~40% of the response followed over the subsequent 20-50 msec. The rate of the slow component in both inner and outer hair cells was similar to the rate of slow adaptation in vestibular hair cells. The rate of the fast component was similar to that of auditory hair cells in other organisms and several properties were consistent with a model that proposes calcium-dependent release of tension allows transduction channel closure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Lelli, Y. Asai, A. Forge, J. R. Holt, and G. S. G. Geleoc
Tonotopic Gradient in the Developmental Acquisition of Sensory Transduction in Outer Hair Cells of the Mouse Cochlea
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 2961 - 2973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. Stepanyan and G. I. Frolenkov
Fast Adaptation and Ca2+ Sensitivity of the Mechanotransducer Require Myosin-XVa in Inner But Not Outer Cochlear Hair Cells
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2009; 29(13): 4023 - 4034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.