JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (December 26, 2007). doi:10.1152/jn.00919.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/1461    most recent
00919.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rasch, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Logothetis, N. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rasch, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Logothetis, N. K
Submitted on August 16, 2007
Accepted on December 24, 2007

Inferring spike trains from local field potentials

Malte Johannes Rasch1, Arthur Gretton2, Yusuke Murayama3, Wolfgang Maass1, and Nikos K Logothetis4*

1 Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
2 Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tubingen, Germany
3 Physiology of Cognitive Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tubingen, Germany
4 Physiology of Cognitive Processes , Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tubingen, Germany; Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nikos.logothetis{at}tuebingen.mpg.de.

We investigated whether it is possible to infer spike trains solely on the basis of the underling local field potentials (LFPs). Employing support vector machines and linear regression models, we found that in the primary visual cortex (V1) of monkeys, spikes can indeed be inferred from LFPs, at least with moderate success. Although there is a considerable degree of variation across electrodes, the low-frequency structure in spike trains (in the 100 ms range) can be inferred with reasonable accuracy, whereas exact spike positions are not reliably predicted. Two kinds of features of the LFP are exploited for prediction: the frequency power of bands in the high {gamma}-range (40-90 Hz), and information contained in low-frequency oscillations (<10 Hz), where both phase and power modulations are informative. Information analysis revealed that both features code (mainly) independent aspects of the spike-to-LFP relationship, with the low-frequency LFP phase coding for temporally clustered spiking activity. Although both features and prediction quality are similar during semi-natural movie stimuli and spontaneous activity, prediction performance during spontaneous activity degrades much more slowly with increasing electrode distance. The general trend of data obtained with anesthetized animals is qualitatively mirrored in that of a more limited data set recorded in V1 of awake monkeys. In contrast to the cortical field potentials, thalamic LFPs (e.g. LFPs derived from recordings in dLGN) hold no useful information for predicting spiking activity.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.